C-824 de 2006
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería
✓Claimant Elena Lucia Ortiz Henao Y Otro
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Norma derogada
- Auxilio de cesantía
- Configuración
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Codigo sustantivo del trabajo articulos 229 lit.
B 247 (parcial) y 251 lit.
B.
Exoneracion de pago y excepciones de reconocimiento de prestaciones y privilegios economicos para los trabajadores accidentales o transitorios.los actores consideran que las disposiciones demandadas contradicen los articulos 4 y 53 de la constitucion.sobre la derogatoria de los articulos 229 literal b) y 247 del codigo sustantivo del trabajo.
Cosa juzgada constitucional respecto del articulo 251 literal b).inhibida y estarse a lo resuelto en c-823 de 2006
What it decided
Holdings on Decreto 2663/50. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (4 points)
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
- R E S U E L V E:
- Primero. DECLARARSE INHIBIDA para emitir un pronunciamiento de fondo en relación con los artículos 229, literal b) y 247(parcial) del Código Sustantivo del Trabajo
- Segundo. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C- 823 de 2006 , mediante la cual se declaró inexequible el literal b) del artículo 251 del Código Sustantivo del Trabajo.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.