JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 20, 2002Full bench

C-672 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Carlos Eduardo Naranjo Florez

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Ineptitud De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Norma De La Ley 141 De 1994
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Disposición acusada derogada tácitamente y declarada de forma diferida inexequible formalmente
Ley Inexequible Formal
  • Reproducción de contenido normativo
Ley Inexequible Formal Diferida
  • No expedición en la fecha permite recobrar vigencia de ley modificada
Norma Inexequible Formal
  • No pronunciamiento de fondo ante reproducción de contenido normativo por alcance diferente y distintos efectos jurídicos
  • Pronunciamiento de fondo por reproducción de contenido normativo
  • Reproducción de contenido normativo en regímenes integrales diferentes
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 141 de 1994.

Arts. 13 y 16 (ps.).

Fondo nacional de regalias.

Comision nacional de regalias.

Derecho del estado a percibir regalias por la explotacion de recursos naturales no renovables de propiedad del estado.

Liquidacion y distribucion.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 141/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 13Ley 141/94DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 16Ley 141/94 «parágrafo 4»DECLINED TO RULE
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declararse INHIBIDA para decidir en el fondo la demanda incoada en contra del articulo 13 de la Ley 141 de 1994, y del paragrafo 4deg del articulo 16 de la misma Ley.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.