JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 22, 2007Full bench

C-653 de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Luis Hemel Lopez Ortega

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Ineptitud De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Decreto 1791 De 2000
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 1791 de 2000 articulo 21 numerales 4º 6º y pagarafo 3 (parcial) y articulo 22 numeral 2º.

Se modifican las normas de carrera de personal de oficiales.

Nivel ejecutivo suboficiales y agentes de la policia nacional.

Requisitos para ascenso de oficiales nivel ejecutivo y suboficiales.

Evaluacion de la trayectoria profesional.

El demandante considera que las normas acusadas violan los articulos 1 13 29 47 53 220 y 222 de la constitucion politica y desconoce el convenio 159 de la oit y la convencion internacional para la eliminacion de todas las formas de discriminacion contra las personas con discapacidad.inhibicion de la corte por ausencia de cargos ciertos.

La demanda no presenta argumentos susceptibles de ser analizados en sede de constitucionalidad.

Los argumentos que se presentan no son ciertos.inhibida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1791/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 21Decreto 1791/00 «parágrafo 3»DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 22Decreto 1791/00 «numeral 2»DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 3Decreto 1791/00DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 6Decreto 1791/00DECLINED TO RULE
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declararse INHIBIDA para pronunciarse sobre la exequibilidad de los numerales 4deg y 6deg, y paragrafo 3 -parcial-, del articulo 21 del Decreto-ley 1791 de 2000 y del numeral 2deg del articulo 22 del mismo (Decreto-ley 1791 de 2000).
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.