JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 31, 2000Full bench

C-636 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Samuel Jose Ramirez Poveda

✓
Topic · hard data
Principio De Solidaridad En Contrato De Servicios Publicos En Materia De Arrendamiento De Inmueble. Restitución De Lo Pagado Por El Propietario
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Contrato De Servicios Publicos
  • Celebración por personas diferentes al propietario
  • Propietario, arrendatario, comodatario, poseedor y ocupante de inmueble
  • Aseguramiento del recaudo de costos
  • Onerosidad
  • Partes
  • Usuarios
Estado Social De Derecho En Materia De Servicios Publicos
  • Satisfacción de necesidades vitales de población
  • Usuarios
Estado Social De Derecho
  • Filosofía política
  • Realización y eficacia sustantiva
Servicios Publicos Domiciliarios
  • Beneficiarios
  • Naturaleza de la relación jurídica entre empresa y usuario
Servicios Públicos
  • Universalidad
  • Usuarios válidos
Principio De Solidaridad En Contrato De Servicios Publicos
  • Finalidad
  • Propietario y arrendatario
  • Propietario, suscriptor y usuarios
8 topics · 19 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 142/94.

Arts. 129 parc.

Y 134.

Celebracion del contrato.

Servicios publicos domiciliarios.

Exequibles.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 142/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 129Ley 142/94UPHELD
Art. 134Ley 142/94UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLES el art. 134 y las expresiones acusadas del artículo 129 de la ley 142/94.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.