JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 10, 1996Full bench

C-530 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Andres Molina Ochoa

✓
Topic · hard data
C.P.C. Art. 407 N° 4. Modificado Por El Dec. 2282/89. Art. 1 N° 210. Declaracion De Pertenencia. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Bienes Fiscales
  • Imprescriptibles
Declaracion De Pertenencia
  • Improcedencia sobre bienes imprescriptibles
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1400/70. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
Art. 407Decreto 1400/70 «inciso 4»UPHELD
Art. 407Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
Art. 407Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
Art. 407Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
5 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (21 points)
  1. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el inciso
  2. cuarto. del artículo 407 del Código de Procedimiento Civil, tal como fue modificado por el decreto 2282 de 1989.
  3. CARLOS GAVIRIA DÍAZ
  4. Presidente
  5. JORGE ARANGO MEJÍA
  6. Magistrado
  7. ANTONIO BARRERA CARBONELL
  8. Magistrado
  9. EDUARDO CIFUENTES MUÑOZ
  10. Magistrado
  11. JOSÉ GREGORIO HERNÁNDEZ GALINDO
  12. Magistrado
  13. HERNANDO HERRERA VERGARA
  14. Magistrado
  15. ALEJANDRO MARTÍNEZ CABALLERO
  16. Magistrado
  17. FABIO MORÓN DÍAZ
  18. Magistrado
  19. VLADIMIRO NARANJO MESA
  20. Magistrado
  21. MARTHA VICTORIA SÁCHICA DE MONCALEANO
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.