JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 2, 1995Full bench

C-491 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Hernan Dario Velasquezgomez

✓
Topic · hard data
C.P.C. Art. 140. Inc. 1 Subrogado Por El Art. 1 N° 80 Del Dec. 2282/89. Causales De Nulidad. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad
  • Causales taxativas
  • Causales no taxativas
  • Facultad del legislador para determinar causales
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1400/70. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 140Decreto 1400/70UPHELD
Art. 1Decreto 2282/89UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la expresion acusada del inciso 1deg del articulo 140 del Codigo de Procedimiento Civil, subrogado por el art. 1, numeral 80, del decreto 2282 de 1989, con la advertencia expresa de que dicho articulo regulo las causales de nulidad legales en los procesos civiles. En consecuencia, ademas de dichas causales, es viable y puede invocarse la prevista en el art. 29 de la Constitucion, segun el cual, "es nula de pleno derecho, la prueba obtenida con violacion del debido proceso", que es aplicable en toda clase de procesos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJosé Gregorio Hernández Galindo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.