JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 9, 1998Full bench

C-482 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Luz Adriana Rodriguez Fino

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 90/46. Art. 55 Parcial. Sustitucion Pensional Para Compañeros Permanentes. Solteria Durante El Concubinato. Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inconstitucionalidad Sobreviniente
  • Protección especial del matrimonio
Norma Derogada
  • Efectos actuales
Sustitución Pensional
  • Concepto
  • Igualdad entre cónyuge y compañero permanente
  • Finalidad
Principio De Igualdad
  • No discriminación entre cónyuge y compañero permanente
5 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 90/46. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 55Ley 90/46STRUCK DOWN· phrase
Phrase struck down«, siempre que ambos hubieran permanecido solteros durante el concubinato»
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. Primero. Declarar INEXEQUIBLE la expresion "siempre que ambos hubieren permanecido solteros durante el concubinato", contenida en el articulo 55 de la Ley 90 de 1946.
  4. Segundo. Las personas que, con posterioridad al siete de julio de 1991 no hubieren podido sustituirse en la pension del fallecido, por causa de la aplicacion del texto legal que ha sido declarado inconstitucional, podran, a fin de que se vean restablecidos sus derechos constitucionales conculcados, reclamar de las autoridades competentes el reconocimiento de su derecho a la sustitucion pensional.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.