JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 3, 2005Full bench

C-450 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Jorge Alonso Garrido Abad

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Ineptitud De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Norma De La Ley 44 De 1993
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Argumentación fundada en la ejecución de normas jurídicas
Sociedad De Gestion Colectiva De Derechos De Autor
  • Facultad de regulación deriva de la Constitución Económica
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 44 de 1993 arts 10 y 27.

Modifica y adiciona la ley 23 de 1982 y modifica la ley 29 de 1944.

Formación de sociedades de gestion colectiva de los titulares de derechos de autor y derechos conexos.

Ineptitud de la demanda.

La accion de inconstitucionalidad se caracteriza por su informalidad lo que se traduce en una minima exigencia de requisitos impuestos por la ley al demandante.

La finalidad que se persigue en el presente proceso es distinta a la defensa objetiva abstracta y general del orden juridico.

Inhibida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 29/44. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionLey 29/44DECLINED TO RULE
On the entire provisionLey 23/82DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 10Ley 44/93DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 27Ley 44/93DECLINED TO RULE
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. INHIBIRSE para decidir de fondo sobre la demanda de inconstitucionalidad instaurada contra los artículos 10 y 27 de la Ley 44 de 1993.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.