JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 9, 1992Full bench

C-447 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓
Topic · hard data
Declaracion Del Estado De Emergencia Economica Y Social. Servicio Publico De Energia. Conmocion Interior.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Revisión de constitucionalidad del Decreto Legislativo N.º 680 de 1992, "por el cual se declara el Estado de Emergencia Económica y Social".

La precipitada norma fue declarada por consecuencia del fenómeno del niño, la cual trajo la peor sequía en 34 años del país.

Lo anterior, ocasionó una abrupta reducción de la oferta de energía eléctrica que ocasionó profundos traumas en la vida social y económica del país.

Declaró la constitucional el decreto legislativo objeto de revisión.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto legislativo 680/92. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto legislativo 680/92UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declárase CONSTITUCIONAL el Decreto 680 de abril 23 de 1992, "por el cual se declara el Estado de Emergencia Económica y Social".
  2. Comuníquese al Presidente de la República y al Presidente del Congreso, publíquese, insértese en la Gaceta de la Corte Constitucional y archívese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceEduardo Cifuentes MuñozConcurrenceCiro Angarita Baron
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.