JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 5, 2000Full bench

C-389 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Liliana Perdomo Castro

✓
Topic · hard data
Sistema De Prima Media Con Prestacion Definida Y Sistema De Ahorro Individual Con Solidaridad. Traslado Y Operancia Del Bono Pensional
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Bono Pensional
  • Elemento propio de ahorro individual con solidaridad en fijación edad de referencia para cálculo y redención
  • Sistema de cálculo del valor y momento para la redención
  • No discriminación en edad de referencia para cálculo y redención en ingreso al ahorro individual con solidaridad
Sistema De Prima Media Con Prestacion Definida Y Sistema De Ahorro Individual Con Solidaridad
  • Edades y mínimo de semanas para acceso a pensión
  • Traslado y operancia del bono pensional
4 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 100/93.

Art. 117 parcial.

Dec. 1299/94.

Arts. 347 y 11 parciales.

Redencion y calculo del bono pensional.

Diferencia de edad de jubilacion y principio de igualdad.

Exequibles.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 100/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 117Ley 100/93 «apartes»UPHELD
Art. 11Decreto 1299/94UPHELD
Art. 3Decreto 1299/94UPHELD
Art. 4Decreto 1299/94UPHELD
Art. 7Decreto 1299/94UPHELD
5 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLES los apartes impugnados del artículo 117 de la Ley 100 de 1993 y de los artículos 3º, 4º, 7º y 11 del decreto 1299 de 1994, pero únicamente por el cargo de la demanda estudiado en esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.