JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 22, 1996Full bench

C-377 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 253/95. Convenio De Basilea Sobre El Control De Movimientos Fronterizos De Los Desechos. Peligrosos Y Su Eliminacion. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Convenio Internacional
  • Alcance
  • Exequibilidad
Derecho Al Ambiente Sano
  • Repercusión internacional
Gobierno
  • Declaración
Constitucion Politica
  • Prohibición de introducir residuos nucleares y desechos tóxicos
7 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 253/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionLey 253/95UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. DECLARAR EXEQUIBLE el "Convenio de Basilea sobre el control de los movimientos transfronterizos de los desechos peligrosos y su eliminacion" hecho en Basilea el 22 de marzo de 1989 y la Ley 253 de 1995 aprobatoria del mismo, bajo la condicion de que el Gobierno de Colombia, formule una declaracion o manifestacion, acogiendose al articulo 26 de dicho Convenio, en el sentido de que el articulo 81 de la Constitucion prohibe la introduccion al territorio nacional de residuos nucleares y desechos toxicos.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR la comunicacion de la presente decision a la Presidencia de la Republica y al Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, para los fines contemplados en el articulo 241, numeral 10, de la Constitucion Politica.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.