JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 25, 1994Full bench

C-374 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Juan De Jesus Uribe

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 80/93. Estatuto Gral De Contratacion De La Administracion Publica. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

7 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2652/91. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 11Decreto 2652/91 «numeral 3»UPHELD
Art. 22Decreto 2699/91 «numeral 16»UPHELD
Art. 371Ley 5/92UPHELD
Art. 11Ley 80/93 «parcial»UPHELD
Art. 12Ley 80/93UPHELD
Art. 2Ley 80/93 «literal b, numeral 1»UPHELD
Art. 53Ley 42/93UPHELD
Art. 57Ley 42/93UPHELD
Art. 81Ley 80/93 «parágrafo 2»UPHELD
9 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. Declárase EXEQUIBLE el literal b) del artículo 2o. de la ley 80 de 1993.
  2. Segundo. Decláranse EXEQUIBLES los numerales 1o., 2o., 3o., literal a), y las expresiones "Los contralores departamentales, distritales y municipales", del literal b) del artículo artículo 11 de la misma ley.
  3. Tercero. Declárase EXEQUIBLE la expresión "transitorio", contenida en el parágrafo 2o., del artículo 81 de la ley en mención.
  4. Cuarto. Declárase EXEQUIBLE el artículo 12 de la misma ley.
  5. Quinto. Por las mismas razones expuestas en la parte motiva, decláranse EXEQUIBLES los artículos 53 y 57 de la ley 42 de 1993, 371, numeral 2o., de la ley 5a. de 1992; artículo 11, numeral 3o., del decreto 2652 de 1991 y 22, numeral 16, del decreto 2699 de 1991.
  6. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.