JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 14, 1994Full bench

C-319 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Carlos Navia Palacios

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 5/92. Arts 296 A 304. Perdida De Investidura De Congresista. Exequibles E Inexequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Suprema De Justicia
  • Competencia privativa
Perdida De Investidura De Congresista
  • Competencia de la Sala Contencioso Administrativa del Consejo de Estado
  • Indebida destinación de dineros públicos
  • Existencia de sentencia penal condenatoria
  • Naturaleza
  • Procedimiento
  • Tráfico de influencias
Consejo De Estado
  • Competencia para conocer procesos de pérdida de investidura
7 topics · 10 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 5/92. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 296Ley 5/92UPHELD
Art. 297Ley 5/92STRUCK DOWN
Art. 298Ley 5/92STRUCK DOWN
Art. 299Ley 5/92UPHELD
Art. 300Ley 5/92UPHELD
Art. 301Ley 5/92STRUCK DOWN
Art. 302Ley 5/92STRUCK DOWN
Art. 303Ley 5/92STRUCK DOWN
Art. 304Ley 5/92STRUCK DOWN
9 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. PRIMERO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el articulo 296 de la Ley 5a. de 1992, salvo el paragrafo 2o. de dicho articulo el cual se declara INEXEQUIBLE.
  4. SEGUNDO. Declarar INEXEQUIBLES los articulos 297 y 298 de la Ley 5a. de 1992.
  5. TERCERO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el articulo 299, salvo las frases "En los eventos indicados" y "al dia siguiente", que se declaran INEXEQUIBLES.
  6. CUARTO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el articulo 300 de la Ley 5a. de 1992.
  7. QUINTO. Declarar INEXEQUIBLES los articulos 301, 302, 303 y 304 de la Ley 5a. de 1992.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.