JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 22, 2001Full bench

C-303 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓
Topic · hard data
Control De Constitucionalidad Del Convenio Básico De Cooperación Técnica Y Científica Entre La República De Colombia Y La República De Nicaragua
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Tratado Internacional
  • Representación sin plenos poderes
  • Condicionamiento de acuerdos complementarios
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 604 de 2000.

Convenio basico de cooperacion tecnica y cientifica entre colombia y nicaragua.

Soberania nacional.

Equidad.

Reciprocidad.

Conveniencia nacional.

Fomento de programas y proyectos del orden economico y social.

Exequibles.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 604/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el "CONVENIO BASICO DE COOPERACION TECNICA Y CIENTIFICA ENTRE LA REPUBLICA DE COLOMBIA Y LA REPUBLICA DE NICARAGUA", hecho en Bogota a los veintiocho (28) dias del mes de junio de mil novecientos noventa y uno (1.991).
  2. Segundo. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la Ley 604 de julio 27 de 2000, por medio de la cual se aprueba el "CONVENIO BASICO DE COOPERACION TECNICA Y CIENTIFICA ENTRE LA REPUBLICA DE COLOMBIA Y LA REPUBLICA DE NICARAGUA", hecho en Bogota a los veintiocho (28) dias del mes de junio de mil novecientos noventa y uno (1.991).
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.