JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 16, 1997Full bench

C-292 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Jorge Enrique Benavides Lopez

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 100/80. C.P. Arts. 299300301302303304305308 Y 312 Parciales. Acto Sexual Violento. Acceso Carnal. Prostitucion. Exeq.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Delitos Contra La Libertad Y El Pudor Sexuales
  • Competencia legislativa para aumento de penas
Legislador
  • Competencia para graduar las penas
Delitos Contra La Dignidad Y Honor Sexuales
  • Establecimiento de penas distintas
5 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 100/80. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 299Decreto 100/80UPHELD
Art. 300Decreto 100/80UPHELD
Art. 301Decreto 100/80UPHELD
Art. 302Decreto 100/80UPHELD
Art. 303Decreto 100/80UPHELD
Art. 304Decreto 100/80UPHELD
Art. 305Decreto 100/80UPHELD
Art. 308Decreto 100/80UPHELD
Art. 312Decreto 100/80UPHELD
Art. 3Ley 360/97UPHELD
Art. 312Ley 360/97UPHELD
Art. 4Ley 360/97UPHELD
Art. 5Ley 360/97UPHELD
Art. 6Ley 360/97UPHELD
Art. 7Ley 360/97UPHELD
Art. 9Ley 360/97UPHELD
16 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Decláranse EXEQUIBLES los artículos 301 y 302 del Código Penal (Decreto 100 de 1980), en las partes demandadas.
  2. Segundo. Decláranse EXEQUIBLES, en las partes demandadas, los artículos 299, 300, 303, 304, 305, 308 y 312 del Código Penal (Decreto 100 de 1980), tal como fueron modificados por la Ley 360 de 1997.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.