JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 29, 2006Full bench

C-246 de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Marco Aurelio Ardila Gomez

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Absoluta En Norma Sobre Asistencia De Menores De Edad A Espectáculo Taurino
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Absoluta
  • Configuración en norma sobre asistencia de menores de edad a espectáculo taurino
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 916 de 2004 articulo 22 parcial.

Se establece el reglamento nacional taurino.

Los menores de diez (10) años de edad deberan ingresar en compañía de un adulto.

Para el demandante la norma acusada es contraria a la especial proteccion del menor.

El asistir a este tipo de espectaculos implicaria un maltrato psiquico prohibido en el articulo 12 de la constitucion y desconoce el derecho a la salud de los niños.

Existencia de cosa juzgada.

Estarse a lo resuelto en c-1192 de 2005

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 916/04. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 22Ley 916/04ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. PRIMERO. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-1192/05, en relacion con los apartes "Los menores" y "de edad deberan ingresar" del articulo 22 de la Ley 916 de 2004.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
Partial dissentHumberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.