JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 21, 2007Full bench

C-215 de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Christian Felipe Patarroyo Corredor

✓
Topic · hard data
Contrato De Aprendizaje Con Menor De Quince Años, Derogatoria De Norma Que Lo Establecía
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Codigo sustantivo del trabajo articulo 82 (parcial).

Capacidad para celebrar contrato de aprendizaje.el demandante considera que la norma acusada vulnera los articulos 44 45 y 67 de la constitucion politica.cuando una norma se encuentra fuera del ordenamiento juridico en razon de su derogacion bien sea expresa o tacita u organica y en consecuencia carece de vigencia no tiene objeto alguno efectuar el control de constitucionalidad a menos que tal norma derogada continue produciendo efectos juridicos.la norma demandada fue derogada tacitamente en virtud de lo dispuesto en los articulos 30 a 41 de la ley 789 de 2002 mediante los cuales se regulo lo concerniente a la relacion de aprendizaje.inhibida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2663/50. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 82Decreto 2663/50DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 82Ley 188/59DECLINED TO RULE
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. INHIBIRSE de proferir decisión de fondo sobre el artículo 82 del Código Sustantivo del Trabajo, subrogado por el artículo 2º. de la Ley 188 de 1959.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.