JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 24, 2004Full bench

C-157 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Jaime Guzmán Rodriguez

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Revisión De Reconocimiento De Sumas Periódicas A Cargo Del Tesoro O De Fondos Públicos
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Revisión de reconocimiento de sumas periódicas a cargo del tesoro o de fondos públicos
Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Cargo dirigido en contra de norma diferente a la vigente luego del control constitucional
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 797 de 2003.

Art. 20.

Ley 100 de 1993.

Reforma sistema general de pensiones.

Regimenes pensionales exceptuados y especiales.

Revisión reconocimiento sumas periódicas a cargo del tesoro publico o fondos publicos.

En cualquier tiempo.

Cosa juzgada constitucional

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 797/03. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 20Ley 797/03DECLINED TO RULE
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. Primero. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-835 de 2003, en relacion con la inexequibilidad de la expresion "en cualquier tiempo", contenida en el
  4. primero. y
  5. tercero. incisos del articulo 20 de la Ley 797 de 2003.
  6. Segundo. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-835 de 2003, en relacion con los cargos contra el articulo 20 de la Ley 797 de 2003, por la supuesta vulneracion de los articulos 29 y 83 superiores.
  7. Tercero. INHIBIRSE de efectuar pronunciamiento de fondo por ineptitud sustancial de la demanda en relacion con el cargo planteado contra el articulo 20 de la ley 797 de 2003 por la supuesta vulneracion de los articulos 1 y 53 superiores.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.