JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 18, 1996Full bench

C-153 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 208/96. Por El Cual Se Prorroga El Estado De Conmocion Interior. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conmocion Interior
  • Declaración no sujeta a control de constitucionalidad
  • Prórroga
  • Prórroga por hechos nuevos
  • Consulta de la realidad nacional
  • Declaración sujeta a control político del Congreso
  • Situaciones que dan lugar a prórroga
Corte Constitucional
  • Límites
  • No tiene competencia para examinar contenido material y razones de conmoción
Conmocion Interior Doble
  • Improcedencia
  • Procedencia
Guerra Exterior
  • Declaración no sujeta a control de constitucionalidad
5 topics · 12 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 208/96. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto 208/96UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declárase EXEQUIBLE el decreto 208 del 29 de enero de 1996, por el cual se prorroga el estado de conmoción interior.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available4
ConcurrenceFabio Morón DíazConcurrenceCarlos Gaviria DíazConcurrenceVladimiro Naranjo MesaConcurrenceHernando Herrera Vergara
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.