JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 25, 1996Full bench

C-328 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 777/96. Por El Cual Se Prorroga El Estado De Conmocion Interior. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conmocion Interior
  • Control de constitucionalidad
  • Declaración sujeta a control político del Congreso
  • Declaración no sujeta a control de constitucionalidad
  • Declaración, levantamiento o prórroga no sujetos a control de constitucionalidad
  • Prórroga
Guerra Exterior
  • Declaración no sujeta a control de constitucionalidad
Corte Constitucional
  • Alcance del control de decretos legislativos
  • Incompetencia
Estados De Excepcion
  • Facultades del Presidente de la República
Orden Publico
  • Conservación y restablecimiento
6 topics · 10 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 777/96. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto 777/96UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. PRIMERO. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el Decreto 777 de abril veintinueve (29) de 1996 "por el cual se prorroga el Estado de Conmocion Interior"
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available4
ConcurrenceAlejandro Martínez CaballeroConcurrenceJosé Gregorio Hernández GalindoConcurrenceCarlos Gaviria DíazConcurrenceVladimiro Naranjo Mesa
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.