JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 19, 1997Full bench

C-130 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 089/97. Por El Cual Se Expiden Normas Sobre El Impuesto De Timbre. Emergencia. Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inexequibilidad Declaracion De Conmocion Interior
  • Pérdida de vigencia de decretos expedidos
  • Sentencia inhibitoria sobre decretos expedidos
Inexequibilidad Declaracion De Emergencia
  • Decisión inhibitoria sobre decretos legislativos posteriores
  • Producción efectos fallos de decretos legislativos
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 089/97. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto 089/97STRUCK DOWN
On the entire provisionDecreto 080/97STRUCK DOWN
Phrase struck down«Por medio del cual se declara el estado de emergencia económica y social.»
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar INEXEQUIBLE el Decreto 089 del 15 de enero de 1997 "Por el cual se expiden normas sobre el impuesto de timbre"
  2. Segundo. La presente decisión sólo produce efectos a partir del día siguiente a la notificación de la sentencia C-122 de marzo 7 de 1997, la cual declaró inexequible el Decreto 080 de 1997 "Por medio del cual se declara el estado de emergencia económica y social."
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
DissentJosé Gregorio Hernández GalindoDissentCarlos Gaviria Díaz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.