JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)December 2, 2003Full bench

C-1151 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Carlos Arturo Rocha Ramos

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 680 De 2001. Art. 11. Reforma Leyes 14 De 1991. 182 De 1995 Y 335 De 1996. Operadores De Television Por Suscripcion Y De Television Abierta. Garantia Recepcion De Canales Colombianos Sintonizados En Vhf Uhf O Satelital. Suministro Sin Costo Alguno A U
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada
  • Alcance de las decisiones de la Corte Constitucional
  • Identidad de norma cargo y fundamento
  • Existencia
  • Configuración
Libertad Economica
  • Confrontación con la prestación de servicio público y derecho a la información
Operadores De Television Por Suscripcion
  • Medida es una obligación impuesta directamente por el legislador en función del interés general
  • Medida no constituye cláusula exorbitante
  • Medida no vulnera libertad económica
Pluralismo
  • Efectividad
Television
  • Operadores de televisión por suscripción no se encuentran en plano de igualdad respecto a operadores de televisión abierta
6 topics · 11 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 680/01. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 11Ley 680/01ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-654 de 2003 (M.P. Clara Inés Vargas Hernández), en la que esta Corporación decidió declarar EXEQUIBLE el artículo 11 de la Ley 680 de 2001
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.