JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 10, 2004Full bench

C-102 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Carlos Alberto Ramirez Alviz

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Inasistencia Alimentaria
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Inasistencia alimentaria
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 599 de 2000.

Art. 233.

Codigo penal.

Inasistencia alimentaria a conyuge.

Exclusion compañeros permanentes de union marital de hecho.

Ejercicio de la accion penal.

Cosa juzgada constitucional.

Estese en la sentencia c-016/04

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 599/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 233Ley 599/00ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-016 de 2004, que declaro exequible por los cargos analizados y en las condiciones previstas en su parte resolutiva, la expresion "conyuge" contenida en el articulo 233 de la Ley 599 de 2000.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
DissentAlvaro Tafur GalvisConcurrenceJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.