JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)January 27, 2004Full bench

C-042 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Sandra Milena Moncada Rendon Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Pena Restrictiva De La Libertad. Privación Del Derecho A Residir En Determinados Lugares O De Acudir A Ellos
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Pena Accesoria
  • Privación del derecho a residir en determinados lugares de acudir a ellos
Pena Restrictiva De La Libertad
  • Privación del derecho a residir en determinados lugares o de acudir a ellos
Destierro
  • Alcance del concepto
  • Concepto sobre prohibición se ajusta a tratados internacionales
  • Prohibición
Libertad De Locomocion
  • Proporcionalidad de la pena restrictiva
9 topics · 10 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 599 de 2000.

Art. 43 num. 7.

Codigo penal.

Penas privativas de otros derechos.

Privacion de residir en determinados lugares o de acudir a ellos.

Restriccion a la libertad de locomocion.

Proporcionalidad.

Destierro.

Expulsion o prohibicion de entrada al territorio nacional

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 599/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 43Ley 599/00UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el numeral 7º del artículo 43 de la ley 599 de 2000.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.