C-042 de 2002
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández
✓Claimant Ilia Ines Castañeda De Sanchez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Razones por las cuales textos acusados se estiman violados
- Requisitos de los cargos de inconstitucionalidad
- Sustentación lógica de cargos de inconstitucionalidad
- Ausencia de cargos
- Formulación aparente de cargos
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 600 de 2000.
Art. 304 (p.).
Codigo de procedimiento penal.
Reconocimiento a traves de fotografias por no estar capturada la persona.
Principio de in dubio pro reo.
Ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda.
Inhibida.
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 600/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- INHIBIRSE para pronunciarse de fondo respecto de la expresion "no estar capturada la persona" del articulo 304 de la Ley 600 de 2000, por ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda.
- Notifiquese,
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.