JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 14, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Jose Guillermo Vasquez Huepo

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Nulidad De La Sentencia T-470/07, Proferida Por La Sala Cuarta De Revision De La Corte Constitucional. Nulidad De Sentencias Proferidas Por La Corte Constitucional. Improcedencia De La Solicitud De Nulidad De La Sentencia T-47º De 2007. Las Diferencias Que El Actor Tenga Acerca De La Manera Como Se Contabilizan Los Terminos En La Corporacion, Indistintamente De La Controversia Interpretativa Que Puedan Generar, No Dan Lugar A Que Se Considere Que Existe Una Dilacion Injustificada Cuando Se Produce Un Fallo Dentro De Lo Terminos Reglamentarios. Denegada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Presupuestos formales de procedencia
  • Negar por cuanto no existió vulneración del debido proceso y se pretende reabrir debate jurídico
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-470 de 2007 proferida por la Sala Cuarta de Revision de la Corte Constitucional, presentada por Jose Guillermo Vasquez Huepo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceManuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.