JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 18, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant R. Ines Jaramillo Murillo

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra El Auto Del 6 De Junio De 2007 De Rechazo De La Demanda, Proferido Por El Magistrado Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto. En El Presente Caso La Demanda No Cumplio Con La Carga Argumentativa Exigida Por La Jurisprudencia Constitucional. Confirma El Auto De Rechazo De La Demanda
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Negado porque actor no estructuró cargo de omisión legislativa
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. CONFIRMAR el Auto del seis (06) de junio de 2007, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por la ciudadana R. Ines Jaramillo Murillo contra el articulo 49 de la Ley 6a de 1945.
  2. Notifiquese, copiese e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.