JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 27, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cundinamarca Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud Aclaración De La Sentencia T-320/05. Negar Por Improcedente La Solicitud
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaracion Fallo De Revision De Tutela
  • Improcedencia para establecer sus efectos
Corte Constitucional
  • Incompetencia para absolver consultas que formulen los ciudadanos
  • Incompetencia para señalar directrices a autoridades judiciales sobre los efectos del fallo
  • Incompetencia para servir de órgano consultivo a los jueces
Juez Constitucional
  • Competencia para restablecer derechos fundamentales y determinar los efectos del fallo
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NEGAR por improcedente la solicitud formulada por la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura, mediante providencia del 12 de diciembre de 2005, relativa a que esta Sala aclare la sentencia T-320 de 2005. Oficiese
  2. Segundo. Secretaria devuelva la actuacion a la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cundinamarca.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.