A- de 1997
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo
✓Claimant German Diaz Parra Y Otro
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia para el caso
- Afectación de intereses individuales
- Alcance
- Modificación de jurisprudencia justificada y razonada
- Características sui generis de hechos del proceso
- Verificación razonada de los motivos
- Debe ser expreso
- Procedencia
- Carácter excepcional
- Intereses colectivos
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se denegó la nulidad solicitada respecto de la Sentencia T-566/96, proferida por la Corte Constitucional, toda vez que si no hubo cambio de jurisprudencia, tampoco se dio la violación del debido proceso en la sentencia de revisión, no tiene lugar su nulidad.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- DENIEGASE la nulidad solicitada respecto de la Sentencia T-566 del 28 de octubre de 1996, proferida por la Sala Segunda de Revisión.
- Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.