JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 23, 2003

T-976 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Jzc Vs. Fiscalia General De La Nacion

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Libre Locomocion Y Trabajo De Persona Secuestrada Por Las Farc. Solicitud Inclusion En Programa De Proteccion A Victimas Y Testigos. Valoracion Riesgo De Amenaza. Estado Social De Derecho. Deber Del Ciudadano De Colaborar Con La Administracio
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia por no acreditarse el riesgo que invoca el actor
Deberes Ciudadanos
  • Postura de la jurisprudencia constitucional
Obligacion
  • Carácter jurídico
  • Concepto
Oficina De Proteccion A Testigos
  • Competencia para determinar programa aplicable sin llegar a ser arbitrario
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR las sentencias dictadas en primera instancia por la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Cali y en segunda instancia por la Sala de Casacion Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, en el sentido de NEGAR el amparo de los derechos fundamentales a la libre locomocion y el trabajo del senor JZC.
  2. SEGUNDO. LIBRESE por Secretaria la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.