JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 8, 2002

T-966 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Gustavo Arias Peña Vs. Sociedad Union De Arroceros S.A.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos Al Medio Ambiente Sano Colectivos O Difusos. Emision Gases Y Residuos Por Quemas De Cascarilla De Arroz. Vinculo De Causalidad. Accion Popular. Molino San Joaquin. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Al Ambiente Sano
  • Contaminación por actividad de molinos
Juez Constitucional
  • Demostración que afectación de derechos colectivos conlleva vulneración de derechos fundamentales
Accion Popular
  • Interés colectivo
  • Vulneración de derechos fundamentales
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR por las razones expuestas, la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil del Circuito del Espinal, Tolima, el 21 de mayo de 2002, en la que se confirmó la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  3. Primero. Civil Municipal del Espinal el 10 de abril de 2002 en la que se negó la acción interpuesta por Gustavo Arias Peña.
  4. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.