JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 7, 2002

T-931 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Jose Gabriel Castro Medrano Vs. Jorge Enrique Grijalba Diaz

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Solicitud Constancia Laboral. Respuesta Clara Y Oportuna. Dignidad Del Trabajador. Estado De Subordinacion. Tutela Contra Particulares. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion Ante Particulares
  • Solicitud constancia laboral
Derecho De Peticion Ante Organizaciones Privadas
  • Alcance
  • Dignidad del trabajador hace exigible respuesta de particulares
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado 25 Civil del Circuito de Bogotá, el 15 de julio de 2002, y, en su lugar, TUTELAR el derecho fundamental de petición al señor JOSE CASTRO MEDRANO.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR al señor JORGE ENRIQUE GRIJALBA DIAZ, que en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contadas a partir de la notificación de la presente decisión, proceda a dar respuesta a la petición que el señor JOSE GABRIEL CASTRO MEDRANO le formuló el 18 de enero de 2002.
  3. TERCERO. LÍBRESE por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.