JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 16, 2001

T-880 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Mauricio Mora Greiffenstein Vs Juzgado Promiscuo Del Circuito De Amalfi (Antioquia)·Respondent Sin Información

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Libertad Y Debido Proceso De Gerente De Compañía Minera. Concurrencia De Sanciones Penal Y Disciplinaria Por Desacato. Tutela Contra Providencia Judicial Improcedencia. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela Contra Providencias Judiciales
  • Improcedencia por no existir vía de hecho
Debido Proceso Penal
  • Actor no ejerció su defensa ni interpuso recursos
Desacato De Tutela
  • Concurrencia de sanciones disciplinaria y penal
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR los fallos adoptados por la Sala de Decisión Penal del Tribunal Superior de Antioquia el 19 de noviembre de 2000, y la Sala de Casación Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia el 20 de marzo 2001, mediante los cuales declararon improcedente la acción de tutela interpuesta por el ciudadano Mauricio Mora Greiffenstein contra el Juzgado Promiscuo del Circuito de Amalfi, Antioquia.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR que por Secretaría General se dé cumplimiento a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.