JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 14, 1999

T-795 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Edgar Rueda Beltran

✓
Topic · hard data
No Pago De Cotizaciones A Eps Implica Que Empleador Debe Asumir Gastos Para Atender Salud Del Trabajador. Solsalud. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Empleador
  • Asunción servicio de salud por mora en aportes
Entidad Promotora De Salud
  • Interrupción de servicios por mora patronal
  • Responsabilidad subsidiaria en protección de la salud del trabajador
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Noveno. Penal Municipal de Bucaramanga, por medio del cual se negó el amparo invocado.
  3. Segundo. Dar cumplimiento a lo establecido en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.