JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 5, 2000

T-1351 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Pedro Torres Villamizar Vs. Iss

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Salud Y Seguridad Social. Suspension Atencion En Salud Por Mora En El Pago De Los Aportes Por Empresa En Liquidacion. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Empleador
  • Asunción servicio de salud por mora en aportes
  • Mora de aportes
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Cuarto. Laboral del Circuito de Barranquilla, el tres (3) de marzo del 2000, al resolver sobre la acción de tutela incoada por Pedro Torres Villamizar contra el ISS, pero por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaria líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.