JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 14, 1999

T-791 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Jose Luis Gomez Tapias Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Pago Oportuno De Acreencias Laborales A Docentes Del Magdalena Carencia Actual De Objeto. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Carencia actual de objeto
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR los fallos proferidos por la Sala Casacion Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia (exp. T-218363) y por la Seccion Cuarta de la Sala Contencioso Administrativa del Consejo de Estado (exp. 233722), pero por las motivaciones aqui expuestas.
  2. Segundo. Para el cumplimiento de lo dispuesto en el numeral anterior se ordena que por Secretaria General, se devuelvan los expedientes a los jueces de instancia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.