Tutela ruling (T)August 6, 2003

T-661 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

✓Claimant Jorge Enrique Mora Vs. Codensa S.A.

✓

Topic · hard data

Derecho Al Trabajo De Electricista. Antecedente De Relacion Laboral. Imposicion Veto Para Acceder Frente A Contratistas. Relacion De Causalidad. Deberes Del Juez. Tutela Contra Particulares. Negada.

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho Al Trabajo

No se probó existencia de veto
No se probó relación de subordinación

1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado 47 Civil Municipal de Bogotá, que denegó la tutela interpuesta por Jorge Enrique Mora.
Segundo. Por Secretaría, LÍBRESE la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines allí contemplados.

Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data

✓

Jaime Córdoba Triviño

Reporting justice

✓

Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it

constitutional review unification tutela

Cites6

T-584/98Der. A La Integridad Personal. Der. Al Trabajo En Condiciones Dignas Y Justas. Vigilancia Con Perros Feroces. Concedida.T-105/96Der. De Peticion Frente A Particulares. Notificacion. Seguridad Social. Accidente De Transito. Cia Aseguradora. Negada.T-471/94Der. A La Honra. Der. Al Buen Nombre. Publicacion De Avisos De La Empresa Anunciando Irregularidades Del Presidente Del Sindicato. Concedida.T-507/93Los Particulares En La Prestacion Del Servicio Publico De Correos. Derecho De Peticion. Servientrega. Concedida.T-172/93Derecho A La Investigacion. Universidad De Los Andes Instituto De Genetica. Concedida.T-443/92Derecho De Asociacion Sindical. Derecho De Huelga. Servicio Publico Bancario. Negada.

Cited by0

No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.