JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 5, 1995

T-580 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Oscar Alfredo Lievano

✓
Topic · hard data
Habeas Data. Autorizacion Del Titular Del Dato Para La Divulgacion De La Informacion. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Informacion
  • Autorización previa
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. R E S U E L V E
  2. PRIMERO. REVOCAR las sentencias del Juzgado 17 Civil del Circuito de Santa Fe de Bogota, D.C., proferida el 9 de agosto de 1995 y, del Juzgado 46 Civil Municipal de Santa Fe de Bogota, de junio 28 de 1995 y, en consecuencia, CONCEDER la tutela solicitada por Oscar Alfredo Lievano Rojas, en los terminos que se establecen en el numeral siguiente.
  3. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR al Banco Central Hipotecario abstenerse de enviar a centrales de informacion o bancos de datos administrados por personas privadas informacion relativa a los creditos OH. No 06006228-4, OH. No 06006500-1 y OH. No 0505315-0, hasta tanto no exista autorizacion expresa de Oscar Alfredo Lievano Rojas, titular de tales datos.
  4. TERCERO. Librese comunicacion al Juzgado 46 Civil Municipal de Santa Fe de Bogota, con miras a que se surta la notificacion de esta providencia, segun lo establecido en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.