JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 16, 2000

T-574 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Libia Esther Teheran Simancas

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital Y Trabajo. Mora En El Pago De Salarios. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Subsistencia
  • Retribución salarial
Empleador
  • Falta de presupuesto o insolvencia para pago oportuno de salarios no es razón suficiente
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida el 19 de octubre por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Turbaco (Bolivar). En su lugar, TUTELAR los derechos fundamentales al trabajo y al minimo vital.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al senor Alcalde Municipal de Turbaco (Bolivar), que en termino de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificacion de la presente sentencia, pague los salarios que le adeuda a la senora Libia Esther Teheran Simancas. En caso contrario, el plazo indicado se concedera para iniciar y culminar los tramites presupuestales pertinentes, informando al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Turbaco (Bolivar) de las gestiones que realice, con el objeto de que el pago total se produzca a mas tardar en un (1) mes.
  3. Tercero. El desacato a lo ordenado en esta providencia, se sancionara de conformidad con lo senalado por el articulo 52 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Cuarto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.