JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 29, 1996

T-571 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Evaristo Lopez Quiroga

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. Al Minimo Vital. Der. A La Vida. Tutela Transitoria. Devolucion De Dineros De Cuenta De Ahorros. Caja Agraria. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Transitoria
  • Devolución de dineros consignados
Derecho A La Vida
  • Protección por el Estado
Sustento Minimo Vital
  • Devolución dineros consignados
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (11 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia de la Sala de Casacion Civil y Agraria de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, de fecha 15 de abril de 1996.
  2. Segundo. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafe de Bogota D.C. -Sala de Familia, de fecha 5 de marzo de 1996 con la modificacion de que la tutela se concede, como mecanismo transitorio para evitar un perjuicio irremediable.
  3. Tercero. Los efectos de esta sentencia estaran vigentes, hasta tanto el juez competente no decida sobre la accion que podra promover la Caja de Credito Agrario Industrial y Minero, con el fin de determinar que el demandante no tiene derecho a obtener la devolucion de los dineros depositados en su cuenta de ahorros, junto con los correspondientes rendimientos.
  4. Cuarto. Por Secretaria General, REMITANSE el expediente de tutela y este fallo a la Sala de Familia del Tribunal Superior de Santafe de Bogota para los efectos consagrados en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. ANTONIO BARRERA CARBONELL
  6. Magistrado Ponente
  7. EDUARDO CIFUENTES MUNOZ
  8. Magistrado
  9. CARLOS GAVIRIA DIAZ
  10. Magistrado
  11. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA DE MONCALEANO
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.