JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 6, 1994

T-565 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Antonio Omar Bedoya

✓
Topic · hard data
Igualdad Ante La Ley. Derecho A La Subsistencia. Normas De Rango Legal. Empleado De La Fiscalia. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia del 21 de julio de 1994, proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Civil del Circuito de Medellin.
  3. SEGUNDO. CONFIRMAR, por las razones expuestas en la presente providencia, la sentencia de junio 22 de 1994, proferida por el Juzgado 13 Municipal de Medellin.
  4. TERCERO. LIBRESE comunicacion al Juzgado
  5. Quinto. Civil del Circuito de Medellin, con miras a que se surta la notificacion de esta providencia, segun lo establecido en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.