JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 11, 1992

T-486 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Libardo Molina

✓
Topic · hard data
Habeas Data. Banco De Datos. Derecho A La Intimidad. Asociacion Bancaria. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. Confirmar la Sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá -Sala de Decisión Civil-, por las razones expuestas en esta Sentencia.
  2. Segundo. Solicitar al Procurador General de la Nación que en uso de su facultad de iniciativa legislativa y en desarrollo del artículo 15 de la Carta y demás normas concordantes, considere la conveniencia de presentar a la brevedad posible ante el Congreso de la República un proyecto de ley que proteja eficazmente la intimidad y la libertad informática de los colombianos.
  3. Tercero. Enviar sendas copias del presente fallo a los señores Superintendente Bancario y Director del Departamento Nacional de Estadística (DANE).
  4. Cuarto. Ordenar que por Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional se comunique esta providencia al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá en la forma y para los efectos previstos en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  5. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.