JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 24, 1994

T-533 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Ernesto Prieto Garcia

✓
Topic · hard data
Concurso De Meritos. Cargo A Proveer De Lista De Elegibles. Tecnico Agropecuario. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion Politica,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. REVOCASE la sentencia de fecha 1 de julio de 1994, proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial -Sala Civil Laboral- de Villavicencio, conforme a lo expuesto en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  4. Segundo. DENIEGASE la solicitud de tutela presentada por el senor Ernesto Prieto Garcia y en consecuencia queda sin efecto la actuacion que haya realizado la Alcaldia Municipal de Arauca, en cumplimiento del fallo de segunda instancia revocado.
  5. Tercero. COMUNICAR el contenido de esta decision al Juzgado Laboral del Circuito de Arauca, el cual notificara la sentencia de esta Corte a las partes y adoptara las decisiones necesarias para adecuar su fallo a lo dispuesto por esta, de conformidad con el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.