JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 25, 1998

T-525 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Ovidio Yasno

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Propiedad Colectiva Sobre Los Resguardos Indigenas. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Resguardo Indigena
  • Requisitos para asimilarlo a municipio los fija la ley
  • Participación en los ingresos corrientes de la Nación
Resguardo Indigena Ricaurte
  • Proceso de clasificación de títulos
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia, el fallo de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Laboral, del 21 de mayo de 1998 en la acción de tutela incoada por OVIDIO YASNO, como Gobernador del Resguardo Indígena Ricaurte, contra el Ministerio del Interior.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.