JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 15, 1995

T-515 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Maria Claudia Ferreira Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Educacion. Autonomia Universitaria. Reglamento Educativo. Estudiante De Musica. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Autonomía Universitaria
  • Límites
  • Exclusión carrera de estudios musicales
  • Facultad de reglamentación interna
Universidad
  • Formación integral
Derecho A La Educación
  • Deberes
  • Exclusión carrera de estudios musicales
3 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por la Corte Suprema de Justicia (Sala de Casación Civil) de fecha seis (6) de abril de 1995, en la acción de tutela interpuesta por María Claudia Ferreira Salazar contra la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.
  2. SEGUNDO. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Catorce Civil del Circuito de Santa Fe de Bogotá en el proceso de tutela instaurado contra la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana por José Manuel Díaz Herrera y en su lugar SE CONFIRMA la sentencia proferidad por el Juez Veinticuatro Municipal de Santa Fe de Bogotá que negó la Tutela.
  3. TERCERO. COMUNICAR a través de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional el contenido de la sentencia, al Tribunal Superior del Distrito judicial de Santafé de Bogotá (Sala Civil), y al Juzgado Veinticuatro Civil Municipal de Santa Fe de Bogotá, para los efectos del artículo 36 del Decreto 2591/91.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.