JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 1, 1992

T-496 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Simon Rodriguez Rodriguez

✓Claimant Inversiones U.S.S.A Ltda

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Persona Juridica Como Titular De Accion De Tutela. Caducidad. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. F A L L A :
  3. Primero. Confirmar la sentencia de 12 de febrero de 1992 proferida por el Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá, D.C., Sala Civil, por medio de la cual se acepta en todas sus partes el fallo de tutela de fecha 24 de enero de 1992 proferido por el Juzgado
  4. Séptimo. Civil del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá, D.C., por las razones expresadas en el presente fallo.
  5. Segundo. Comunicar al Juzgado
  6. Séptimo. Civil del Circuito de esta ciudad, la presente decisión para que sea notificada a las partes conforme lo ordena el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de l991, con entrega a todos ellos de copia de esta sentencia. Comunicar al Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Santafé de Bogotá, D.C., Sala Civil, con entrega de copia de este fallo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentCiro Angarita Baron
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.