JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 12, 1994

T-444 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Alvaro Trujillo Arango

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Revision Contra Sentencias De Naturaleza Disciplinaria. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

6 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Confirmar la sentencia de fecha 27 de mayo de 1994 proferida por el H. Consejo de Estado, que a su vez confirmó la sentencia del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca-Sección Segunda, Subsección B de mayo 12, mediante las cuales se negó la tutela impetrada por el demandante Alvaro Trujillo Arango.
  2. SEGUNDO. Líbrense las comunicaciones a que se refiere el artículo 36 de Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines allí previstos.
  3. NOTIFIQUESE,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.