JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 14, 1998

T-425 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Ana Rosa Alvarez De Hinestroza

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. Al Minimo Vital. Pago Oportuno De Mesadas Pensionales Actuales Y Futuras. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Quibdo - Choco-, el quince (15) de mayo de mil novecientos noventa y ocho (1998), dentro de la accion de tutela de la referencia.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la tutela impetrada. En consecuencia, se ordena a las Directivas de la Empresa de Licores del Choco -Sociedad Vinicola de los Robles Ltda. que, si aun no lo ha hecho, reanude el pago de la mesada pensional de la senora Ana Rosa Alvarez de Hinestroza en el termino maximo de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contados a partir de la notificacion de la presente providencia, so pena de incurrir en las sanciones previstas en el Decreto 2591 para el desacato. En cuanto a las mesadas pensionales ya causadas y no pagadas, la demandante podra acudir ante la jurisdiccion ordinaria para exigir su pago.
  3. Tercero. PREVENIR a las Directivas de la Empresa de Licores del Choco-, Sociedad Vinicola los Robles- Ltda, para que no vuelvan a incurrir en la omision de las actuaciones necesarias para garantizar a los pensionados el pago oportuno de sus mesadas.
  4. LIBRENSE las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.