JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 3, 1992

T-404 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Pablo Cabrera Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Periodo De Contralor Auxiliar. Principio De Subsidiariedad. Concedida Parcialmente
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. CONFIRMASE la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Florencia (Caquetá) el 3 de febrero de 1992, por medio de la cual se revocó la del Juez
  4. Primero. de Instrucción Criminal de la misma ciudad, al resolver sobre la acción de tutela instaurada por PABLO GERMAN CABRERA SALAZAR.
  5. Segundo. Revócase la sentencia del 24 de enero de 1992, pronunciada por el Juez
  6. Segundo. de Instrucción Criminal de Florencia (Caquetá), al decidir sobre acción de tutela incoada por JOSE ELIADES TABARES OSPINA.
  7. Tercero. Líbrense las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines allí contemplados, en el sentido de que se ordene al Gobernador del Caquetá la posesión de JOSE ELIADES TABARES OSPINA como Contralor Auxiliar del Departamento durante el periodo para el cual fue elegido.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.