JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 22, 1996

T-398 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Jose Luis Muñoz Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Seguridad Social. Der. A La Salud. Der. A La Vida. Mora En Los Aportes A La E.P.S. Unimec. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Mora en pago de aportes patronales
Derecho A La Seguridad Social
  • Mora en aportes por empleador
Municipio
  • Mora en aportes a EPS
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el numeral 1o. de la sentencia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla, Sala de Decisión Laboral, de fecha once (11) de marzo de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996) y, en su lugar, CONCEDER la tutela impetrada por José Luis Muñoz Barraza respecto de sus derechos a la seguridad social, la salud y la vida.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Alcaldía de Ponedera (Atlántico) hacer, a la mayor brevedad posible, todo lo que sea necesario para ponerse y mantenerse al día en el pago de las cuotas o aportes obrero patronales del señor Muñoz Barraza a la E.P.S. "Unimec", o a la que corresponda.
  3. Tercero. COMUNICAR esta providencia al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla, Sala de Decisión Laboral, para los efectos previstos en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Notifíquese, cópiese, cúmplase e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.